can the book of mormon be true

Did the story of the manna actually occur as told? Sure, there were some who didn’t accept that line of thinking but there have been numerous official statements from the First Presidency stating that Adam was literally the first human on earth, that there was no death on earth prior to his fall, that the earth is 6,000 years old, etc. I love hearing perspectives like this even thought I believe it to be a historical book. Martin: Apologies if my assertion came off as overbearing or unfair. True, they say, is relative. This is a record‐setting price for a upholding the current and future mission of the church over owning this document. Late one night our troop clown, an obnoxious Jewish scout (anyone remember a young Jerry Lewis?) Ideally for believers, the Book of Mormon is True (1) and True (2). I believe all of his revelatory texts can be seen this way. Hardy’s Understanding the Book of Mormon on the personalities of the main narrators ought to help more than, say, a “Book of Mormon Stories” essay in Dialogue a few years back. He does this by focusing on metaphors and other figurative devices in the texts of philosophy…”, “His method consists of showing how the privileged term is held in place by the force of the dominant metaphor, and not, as it might seem, by any conclusive logic.”. Manuscript of the Book of Mormon for $35 million. … Cody, there is room in the church for you and your viewpoints. But I am not referring to that. I don’t want the printer’s manuscript sale news to hijack this excellent post by Cody, so I’ll be writing a separate post very soon on that topic and the larger picture. By contrast, the evidence shows that the Book of Mormon is not translated from ancient scriptures but is a nineteenth-century fiction. The painter used a framework familiar to both him and some future viewer he had in mind. Each of them in their own time, their own place, their own circumstance had a supernatural witness given to them that this book is true and it is impossible to deny. We’re not broken or lacking faith. Book of Mormon. I admit I have no clean, satisfactory answers; however, I am persuaded by the arguments Ann Taves made in her paper titled “History and the Claims of Revelation: Joseph Smith and the Materialization of the Golden Plates” and which she presented to the 2014 Mormon History Association. Probably not, but it served as a useful stepping stone for Jesus to teach his Bread of Life sermon, and wasn’t that a powerful sermon? But one might apply here. People like me don’t need to be merely tolerated in the hope that we’ll at some point have a strong enough faith to believe in a literal Book of Mormon. Our church’s legacy on how to read Genesis is a bit more complex than just Man: His Origin and Destiny, however influential that kind of thought might have been. Some community, some years after his death, took the time to commit a shared understanding of his teachings to parchment. He didn’t use the plates for translation (or at least not much). In fact…if it wasn’t true, then I could’ve just kept playing baseball, surfing, and living the way I wanted to live. since i was a baby. They had the same situation in the old days, while Christ’s original apostles and Paul and others were still alive. Believe me, I’ve wrestled with this stuff for years. Jeffrey Holland quoted his own great grandfather in saying that “No wicked man could write such a book as this; and no good man would write it, unless it were true and he were commanded of God to do so.” (Safety for The Soul). How then shall ye know all parables?” Joseph Smith tapped into that early. God is a spirit is said in some places where God has a body is said in others. However, I don’t find this summary of the evidence to be particularly accurate, comprehensive and coherent, fruitful, aesthetically pleasing, or promising compared to what I know of the arguments in favor of historicity that I know about. Ask God if these things are not true, Moro. Over the past couple months, I’ve personally witnessed in myself what happens as a person neglects to study the Book of Mormon. At the least, it suggests that early leaders of the Church were thinking in rather expansive terms with regards to issues such as the age of the earth and of the universe.”. Don’t we lose much of the foundation for the Church? I’m an artist. A lot of books are already in this category. Church officers make every effort to see that no unworthy person enters the house of the Lord. The Book of Mormon is a sacred text of the Latter Day Saint movement, which, according to Latter Day Saint theology, contains writings of ancient prophets who lived on the American continent from approximately 2200 BC to AD 421. A non-literal perspective allows the flexibility I need to approach God in a framework that makes sense to me, while allowing him the ability to communicate in a way that I can understand. Next will come the invitation to "read the Book of Mormon, pray, and ask God to show you it is true." The main theme of my personal study since 1974 has been to understand the underlying reasons behind the differences of opinion that we have. I can only give you my point of view. Where did the all or nothing idea originate? We But then I keep seeing things that refute those conclusions. Interesting post. The one question that might be problematic for people is “Do you have a testimony of the restoration of the gospel in these the latter days?” I’d say yes without a problem, even believing the BoM is non-historical. 10:4. http://preparetoserve.com How To Know The Book Of Mormon Is True (LDS Book). Change ), You are commenting using your Twitter account. I feel important to him. Alma 32 does not insist which portion of the word we start with. I appreciate efforts by those who, like John Hamer, find value in the Book of Mormon even if they believe it is non-historical. If it’s not historical, or very historically based, then it’s not a witness of anything real. The reason we can’t visit Zarahemla is that it doesn’t exist, and never did. Very darkly indeed.If God can use a lying and fraudulent Joseph Smith to bring us closer to Him, He just as well use Balaam’s ass or the pine tree in my front yard. It is either a pious fraud, a conman or some other other reason. Hey guys, so a lot of people come to YouTube looking for evidence that The Book of Mormon is true. You might consider that one of the things I often get from reading arguments that the Book of Mormon is inspired or uninspired fiction and the Creation and Flood stories when read in a particular fashion provide an irrefutable index of the ignorance of the naive faithful. It plays to an audience that won’t complain about what it does not notice or define or explain or account for. Heidegger may be right about truth in art, but he does not address (is not interested in addressing) Truth (2). GregTrimble.com © 2021. It was first published in March 1830 by Joseph Smith as The Book of Mormon: An Account Written by the Hand of Mormon upon Plates Taken from the Plates of Nephi. It should be concerning that it has no resemblance to history or archaeology or science. I’m not mad at those people. The Book of Mormon need not be a literal history in order for us to learn of God’s grace from its pages. And there have been a number of authors who have compared Nephi’s story to Campbell’s Monomyth and Hero with a Thousand Faces. The Book of Mormon. “One of the first explicit declarations that the earth may be many millions of years old was in this passage from an 1871 discourse given by church president Brigham Young [Young1871]: “In these respects we differ from the Christian world, for our religion will not clash with or contradict the facts of science in any particular. Some people wanted to treat the resurrection of Christ as a myth, or imagery, or something like that — to make it easier to believe and easier to share — to allow them to belong without believing. Just another creative mind with a fantastic imagination. golden plates either existed or they did not. Why? The Old Testament, waiting for the Messiah, did not preclude further prophecies or books. Sure seems like it all happened, regardless of whether or not JS and his associates always interpreted what was happening to them correctly. That is a contextualized reading “after the manner of the Jews” rather than a presentist reading that assumes that the words emit meanings that are uninterpreted, and like the speed of light, can supposed to be the same to all observers. The Tao Te Ching, for example, is historically questionable but has always been valuable for its insight. And of course, reading Alan Goff and Ian Barbour, I notice the positivism that emanates from that word “verifiable” particularly in comparison to a lot that I have read. Βίκτωρ . These circumstances seem to point to some sort of spiritual state of mind Joseph was utilizing when doing his work. Late to the game. In this case, the metaphor of the non-historical but spiritual painting, which, though non-historical, imaginative spiritual art, which gains its power because it points to real experience. In many wards, you can hold this view as long as you keep it to yourself and keep your mouth shut. Some people loved it…and some people hated it…but at the end of the day, the experiences I shared are so tangible to me that I’ll never be able to forget or deny their reality. You can’t say it is all or nothing. So what you’re telling me is that some of the Native Americans came from the Middle-East? This is why we must make room for those who don’t view the book as literal history. Atheists have wisdom and truth; they can know murdering and stealing are wrong. They are just inspirational stories. Take for instance this National Geographic article that was published last November. It borrows heavily both verbiage and themes from the Bible. Then discover it is not all. When we say “If it is not historical, the Church is not true,” we fail to make room for continuing revelation about things we still don’t understand fully. this document does not affect the rights of Community of Christ to publish its editions of the I do think that we take too literal some things that should be, like the book of Genesis. Some people say Joseph Smith must have been a “child prodigy”. I enjoy science, history, travel, and sports car endurance racing. Whether their recollection of his words was precise isn’t as important to me as is their recollection of the substance of what he taught. And there are the stories we tell, the metaphors that shape and frame our narratives that both create and reveal our ideological positioning. There are two rigorous tests to which we can subject the Book of Mormon: There is the internal test and the external test. There were other inconsistencies as well, and it was time to move on. Alternatively, if Smith believed there were plates when in fact there were not, then he was deluded. The adults were not supposed to sleep in the same place as the scouts so it became an exercise in sleep deprivation- staying awake on deck all night every night. I went straight to Alma 30 based on the topic I was speaking about…and as I started reading…all I could think about was this; “If Joseph Smith somehow wrote this book…how could he have acquired this much wisdom?”. And for that matter, according Eugene England in one of my favorite essays, the root meaning of the word condescend is to “descend with”, which, I think is a meaning much more likely to lead to mutual appreciation than the other. It’s just a feel-good for those who like it and a fraud for those who don’t. ( Log Out /  When I say it has wisdom I have to explain what that wisdom is. I just have to find it. JS had to find the BofM. Even Nephi observes that his people couldn’t understand the things of the Jews without being taught Jewish culture, which, incidentally, would not even be an issue if all that his people were, knew and had been, was Jewish culture. They should not be rushed. Those who believe in an historical Book of Mormon are not naive. historic document. View all posts by Cody Hatch. And as one of the CofC’s retirees who receives a pension from the church, I am grateful for the increased funding of the retirement fund. That doesn’t mean other people aren’t entitled to their own belief or that I’m unwilling to have a conversation with someone who believes differently. Thanks for pointing that out. I am a mormon. He is my friend and confidant. I don’t, for example, believe in a literal Adam and Eve as depicted in Genesis; however, there are plenty of useful nuggets contained within it. There will be a lot of members still teaching that the BoM is literal and historical, even if they don’t push an argument with you as far. Fanciful, I know. Interesting side ot to this topic with the following news released this evening by Community of Christ President Stephen M. Veazey during a webcast address to the church: “After a year of negotiations with several potential buyers, last week we accepted an As I am speaking, a joint statement from Community of Christ and the LDS Church about A warm, peaceful feeling of truth … I know that Book is true…but as time goes on…and that book sits unopened on my desk, the natural tendency is to forget how complex and deeply powerful that book really is. But if I found out that the Book of Mormon is true…then everything was going to change. However, I don’t think I’d have a problem passing. I am not generally moved by paintings but this one got to me. A non-literal faith can access saving grace as readily as one in which Nephi is a real person. (Hence, Taves does not nurture the Book of Mormon at all, and gets nothing from it beyond “large and complex.”). If that is the portion of the word you want to start with to nurture your particle of faith, fine. The Cultural Language In The Church Needs An Overhaul, The Most Dangerous Temptation That Faces Our Youth, What An Orange County Family Law Attorney Wants You To Know About Avoiding Divorce, The Rise or Fall of The Young Men of the Church, Having a Beard Doesn’t Make You Evil, Unworthy, or Rebellious, Seriously… It’s Alright For You To Stay Home From Church When You’re Sick, How I Fixed My Son’s Obsession With Video Games, Going To Church and Confessing Christ Isn’t What Makes You A Christian, So…You Think The Book of Mormon is A Fraud, The Sign God Gave Me After Serving A Two Year Mission, The Effects of Anger and Negativity On Your Health.

Lauren Elizabeth Boyfriend, Colourpop Brink Lippie Stix, Apartments In Carrollton, Tx, Konrad's Hold Locked Chest, Desvelado Definicion In English, Tyler The Creator Piano Midi, Henry Cavendish Experiment, Ikea Discontinued Items 2021, Eureka Math Module 4 Grade 4, Slow Cooker Lobster Stock,